Contributory negligence is a legal concept that can arise in cases where a plaintiff, who has suffered harm or injury, is found to have contributed to the harm through their own negligent actions or failure to exercise reasonable care. In jurisdictions that apply contributory negligence, it can affect the amount of compensation the plaintiff is entitled to receive. It is important to note that some jurisdictions have adopted a comparative negligence system, where the plaintiff’s recovery is reduced based on the degree of their own fault rather than completely barred.
Definition of Contributory Negligence: Contributory negligence refers to the plaintiff’s failure to exercise reasonable care for their own safety, which contributes to their own injury or damages.
Complete Bar vs. Comparative Negligence: In jurisdictions that follow a contributory negligence system, if the plaintiff is found to be even slightly negligent, their claim may be completely barred, and they may be unable to recover any damages. In contrast, under a comparative negligence system, the plaintiff’s recovery is reduced proportionally to their degree of fault.
Reasonable Person Standard: Courts assess contributory negligence based on the standard of care that a reasonable person would have exercised in similar circumstances. If the plaintiff’s actions fall below this standard, they may be deemed contributorily negligent.
Assessment of Fault: Courts consider the actions of both the plaintiff and the defendant to determine the degree of fault on each side. The plaintiff’s actions are evaluated in terms of their foreseeability, reasonableness, and the connection to the harm suffered.
Factors for Review: Various factors may be considered in determining contributory negligence, including the plaintiff’s awareness of risks, their ability to avoid harm, and whether they took reasonable precautions. The court may also assess the timing and nature of the plaintiff’s actions.
Comparative Fault: In jurisdictions with comparative negligence, the court assesses the percentage of fault attributable to each party. The plaintiff’s recovery is then reduced by their percentage of fault.
Burden of Proof: The burden of proving contributory negligence generally rests on the defendant. The defendant must demonstrate that the plaintiff’s actions or omissions met the criteria for contributory negligence.
Affirmative Defense: Contributory negligence is often raised as an affirmative defense by the defendant. The defendant asserts that the plaintiff’s own negligence played a role in causing the harm and, therefore, should affect the damages awarded.
Statutory Modifications: Some jurisdictions have modified the traditional contributory negligence rule by adopting comparative negligence statutes. These statutes may allow recovery by the plaintiff even if they were partially at fault, but the recovery is reduced based on their percentage of fault.
Effect on Damages: In contributory negligence systems, if the plaintiff is found to have contributed to their own harm, their damages may be entirely barred. In comparative negligence systems, the damages are reduced proportionally.
Contributory negligence is a complex legal concept, and its application can vary by jurisdiction. It is advisable for individuals involved in legal proceedings to seek legal advice from paralegals like George Brown Professional Corporation to understand how contributory negligence may apply to their specific case and jurisdiction.
“I/WE have been doing business with George Brown Professional Corp for many years on files that became problematic and difficult to find closure on. Mr. Brown and staff "came to the rescue" on each occurrence and painlessly resolved the issues to our satisfaction. Paul Redley VP Commercial Mortgages“
“George fought very hard for my claim and was able to resolve the matter very quickly - if you have any small claims issues, I would highly recommend you use George and his staff.“
My husband and I hired George Brown for a landlord and tenant dispute. Since the moment we hired him, he immediately lifted a huge weight off of our shoulders. George made us feel confident in the process and he was reassuring every step of the way! We had to do very little in regards to the process as George handled everything in a timely manner. The best news..we won our case! Would definitley hire him again in the future, if required.
“George brown paralegal services is very professional well educated in landlord and tenant disputes Marija pavic a person who looked after my case made me very happy and she only had July 28 to the 31st to review my case and made sure everything was covered has things thrown out due to improper filling it was fun and the best outcome I could have asked for. “
BOOK A MEETING TO REVIEW YOUR CASE
BOOK A MEETING TO REVIEW YOUR CASE